Two Meals or Three?
Letting Go of Diet Rules

For a long time, fasting gave me certainty.

Clear windows.
Clear boundaries.
Clear proof that I was “doing it right.”

I’d grown accustomed to eating once or twice a day, often skipping breakfast and having an early dinner. For years, this rhythm felt manageable — even empowering.

But as I transitioned away from keto and into a starch-based way of eating, a new question emerged:

Do I need to eat more often now?

And beneath that question was a deeper fear:

What if eating more often makes everything unravel?

My history with fasting

Fasting wasn’t just a tool for me — it became a language of discipline.

It quieted appetite.
It reduced food decisions.
It offered structure when life felt full.

And in many ways, it worked.

But over time, fasting also trained my nervous system to associate hunger with virtue and fullness with risk.

That’s not something we talk about enough.

Why I didn’t force breakfast

When I began increasing carbohydrates, I didn’t rush to add breakfast just because I “should”.

Instead, I listened.

Some mornings, I genuinely wasn’t hungry.
Other mornings, I noticed a gentle pull toward food — not urgency, not panic — just a signal.

I didn’t want to replace one rigid rule with another.

So I chose flexibility:

  • breakfast when hunger was present
  • no guilt when it wasn’t
  • no forcing either way

That choice alone lowered my stress more than any macro adjustment ever had.

Experimenting with meal timing

What surprised me was how my body responded when I gave it permission.

Some days, two meals felt grounding.
Other days, three smaller meals felt steadier.

There was no “best” number.

What mattered was:

  • stable energy
  • calm digestion
  • absence of urgency

This was new territory — because it required responsiveness, not control.

Honouring hunger without panic

For women who’ve relied on fasting, hunger can feel threatening.

It’s easy to interpret it as:

  • a sign of failure
  • loss of metabolic control
  • something that must be pushed through

But hunger is not an emergency.

It’s information.

Learning to honour hunger without panic was one of the most important nervous system shifts I made.

Sometimes that meant eating earlier.
Sometimes it meant eating a little more.
Sometimes it meant trusting that hunger would pass naturally.

Each time I responded calmly, my body learned something new:

I will be fed. I don’t need to escalate.

Why this matters for women

Women’s bodies — especially in midlife — are exquisitely sensitive to stress.

Rigid fasting schedules can:

  • elevate cortisol
  • disrupt sleep
  • increase food anxiety
  • blunt natural hunger cues

This doesn’t mean fasting is wrong.

It means fasting must remain optional, not compulsory.

Letting go of rules didn’t mean letting go of wisdom

One of my biggest fears was that without rules, I’d lose all restraint.

That didn’t happen.

What replaced rules was attunement:

  • noticing energy dips
  • responding to hunger early
  • choosing foods that satisfied without overstimulation

Ironically, letting go of strict meal timing improved my regulation more than discipline ever did.

A quiet permission

If you’re reading this and afraid to eat more often, I want you to hear this clearly:

Eating more frequently does not mean you are regressing.
It does not mean you are broken.
And it does not mean you’ve lost control.

It may simply mean your body is asking for consistency, not endurance.

In the next post, I’ll talk about why I stopped weighing myself for a while — and why the scale often tells the least helpful story during times of metabolic healing.


Next in the series:

What the Scale Can’t Tell You

Scroll to Top
Review Your Cart
0
Add Coupon Code
Subtotal